Polycrisis Resilience: Minimizing Human Suffering Over the Long Term

Abstract

Polycrisis Resilience is a framework developed by Hunter Hughes that seeks to minimize human suffering, preserve human survivability, and improve the long-term conditions of civilization in an increasingly interconnected world of systemic risks. Rather than treating economic development, technological progress, climate adaptation, institutional strength, and environmental sustainability as separate objectives, the framework integrates them into a unified strategy for reducing the human consequences of compounding crises. Central to the framework is the premise that resilience should be measured not merely by a system's ability to withstand shocks, but by its capacity to prevent suffering across generations through reduced vulnerability, lower exposure to hazards, improved living conditions, and enhanced adaptive capacity.

The report proposes seven interconnected pillars of resilience: clean transition, economic convergence, diffusion of innovations, climate and environmental adaptation, human development, conflict prevention and institutional resilience, and long-term survivability. It argues that economic convergence deserves recognition as a form of polycrisis mitigation because development reduces the structural vulnerabilities that allow risks to compound. The framework introduces the concept of cumulative human suffering avoided as a proposed metric for evaluating interventions across domains, while emphasizing distributional impacts, uncertainty, intergenerational effects, and overlap between benefits.

The report further contends that integrated progress across all seven pillars can achieve substantially greater reductions in long-term suffering than isolated advances in individual sectors. While acknowledging uncertainties in measurement and varying levels of evidence across its claims, it provides a practical agenda for governments, researchers, investors, and civil society to evaluate policies through the shared objective of suffering reduction. Ultimately, Polycrisis Resilience offers a human-centered framework for understanding how development, innovation, adaptation, and institutional capacity can work together to reduce both present and future suffering in an increasingly complex and interconnected world.

Key findings

1. Suffering is the right unit of account. Resilience defined only as the ability to withstand shocks can be satisfied by systems that protect institutions while people go on suffering. Defining the objective as reduced human suffering keeps attention on outcomes: deaths, disease, hunger, deprivation, displacement and lost opportunity.
2. Risks are connected, and so are the people harmed by them. Environmental pressures, socioeconomic vulnerabilities and destabilizing pressures interact and feed back on one another. The IPCC estimates that 3.3 to 3.6 billion people live in contexts that are highly vulnerable to climate change. Vulnerability, not hazard alone, is what turns an event into suffering.
3. Seven pillars carry the framework: clean transition, economic convergence, diffusion of innovations, climate and environmental adaptation, human development, conflict prevention and institutional resilience, and long-term survivability. Each reduces suffering by preventing risks, reducing exposure, expanding adaptive capacity or improving living conditions.
4. Economic convergence is a form of polycrisis mitigation. Closing gaps in income, infrastructure and services reduces the structural vulnerability that lets crises compound, provided convergence is itself clean and sustainable.
5. The pillars reinforce one another. In a qualitative assessment, economic convergence is the pillar that most strengthens the others and human development is the pillar most strengthened by them. Benefits can also run in reverse as vicious loops.
6. A common metric is needed. The proposed concept of cumulative human suffering avoided counts direct and indirect effects, weights them by distribution, shows uncertainty, and removes double-counting. In a hypothetical example, gross benefits of 156 units fall to 118 after overlap.
7. Integration matters more than any single pillar. In a stylized model to 2100, advancing all pillars together lowers cumulative suffering by about 46% against drift, while advancing only the clean transition and growth lowers it by about 28%.

Contents

1. About This Reportp. 3
2. Executive SummaryCentral thesis, key numbers and principal findingsp. 4
3. 1Defining Polycrisis Resiliencep. 6
4. 2The Interconnected Risk Structurep. 10
5. 3The Seven Pillarsp. 13
6. 4Economic Convergence as Polycrisis Mitigationp. 16
7. 5Clean Transition, Diffusion and Adaptationp. 19
8. 6Human Development, Institutions and Survivabilityp. 21
9. 7How the Pillars Work Togetherp. 23
10. 8Measuring Human Suffering Avoidedp. 26
11. 9A Century of Resiliencep. 29
12. 10Criticisms, Limits and What Would Change Our Mindsp. 32
13. 11Agenda for Action and Researchp. 34
14. Glossaryp. 36
15. Referencesp. 36

Section links open the PDF at the corresponding page in a new tab.

Glossary

Adaptive capacity

The ability of people, communities and institutions to adjust to hazards, take advantage of opportunities and cope with consequences.

Cascade

A failure in one system that triggers failure in another.

Common driver

A single underlying cause that produces stress in several systems at once.

Compounding

Several stresses falling on the same people or places at the same time.

Cumulative human suffering avoided

The total reduction in avoidable harm to human life, health, security and opportunity, across people and years, attributable to an intervention compared with a counterfactual.

Economic convergence

The narrowing of gaps in living standards, productive capacity, infrastructure and access to services between developed and developing economies.

Exposure

The presence of people, assets and ecosystems in places where they could be harmed by a hazard.

Maladaptation

Action meant to reduce climate risk that increases risk or vulnerability elsewhere or later.

Planetary boundaries

Limits within which humanity can operate safely with respect to nine Earth-system processes, such as climate, biodiversity and freshwater.

Polycrisis

A cluster of related crises whose interactions produce effects greater than the sum of the parts.

Polycrisis Resilience

The effort to minimize human suffering, preserve human survivability and improve long-term conditions in an increasingly interconnected world of systemic risks.

Resilience

The capacity of a system to absorb disturbance, adapt and recover. In this framework, valued by the human suffering it prevents.

Systemic risk

The risk that failure in one part of an interconnected system spreads and causes widespread harm.

Vulnerability

The propensity of people or systems to be harmed, shaped by poverty, inequality, governance, infrastructure and exposure.

How to cite

@techreport{hughes2026polycrisis,
  title = {Polycrisis Resilience: Minimizing Human Suffering Over the Long Term},
  author = {Hughes, Hunter},
  institution = {H Heuristics},
  type = {Research Report},
  series = {H Heuristics Polycrisis Resilience Series},
  number = {4},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23971332},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23971332},
  copyright = {CC BY 4.0},
  keywords = {polycrisis resilience, human suffering, systemic risk, economic convergence, clean transition, climate adaptation, conflict prevention, vulnerability reduction, sustainable development, cumulative human suffering avoided}
}

Download citation: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris) · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23971332

References

1. Bostrom, N. (2013). Existential risk prevention as global priority. Global Policy, 4(1), 15–31.
2. Comin, D. and Hobijn, B. (2010). An exploration of technology diffusion. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2031–2059.
3. Ember (2026). Global Electricity Review 2026. London: Ember.
4. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (2025). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. Rome: FAO.
5. Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Global Commission on Adaptation (2019). Adapt Now: A Global Call for Leadership on Climate Resilience. Rotterdam and Washington, DC: GCA and World Resources Institute.
7. Hallegatte, S., Bangalore, M., Bonzanigo, L. et al. (2016). Shock Waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty. Washington, DC: World Bank.
8. Health Effects Institute (2025). State of Global Air 2025. Boston, MA: HEI.
9. Holling, C.S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.
10. International Energy Agency (2024). Reducing the Cost of Capital: Strategies to Unlock Clean Energy Investment in Emerging and Developing Economies. Paris: IEA.
11. International Energy Agency (2026). Global EV Outlook 2026. Paris: IEA.
12. International Energy Agency (2026). World Energy Investment 2026. Paris: IEA.
13. International Renewable Energy Agency (2026). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2025. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.
14. IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ipcc.ch
15. Janzwood, S. and Homer-Dixon, T. (2022). What is a global polycrisis? And how is it different from a systemic risk? Cascade Institute Technical Paper 2022-4.
16. Kahn, M.E. (2005). The death toll from natural disasters: the role of income, geography, and institutions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 271–284.
17. Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change (2025). The 2025 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change. The Lancet.
18. Lawrence, M., Homer-Dixon, T., Janzwood, S., Rockström, J., Renn, O. and Donges, J.F. (2024). Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement. Global Sustainability, 7, e6. doi:10.1017/sus.2024.1
19. Morin, E. and Kern, A.B. (1999). Homeland Earth: A Manifesto for the New Millennium. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
20. Murray, C.J.L. and Lopez, A.D. (eds.) (1996). The Global Burden of Disease. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health.
21. Ord, T. (2020). The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. London: Bloomsbury.
22. Rodin, J. (2014). The Resilience Dividend: Being Strong in a World Where Things Go Wrong. New York: PublicAffairs.
23. Rogers, E.M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
24. SEforALL, IEA, IRENA, UNSD, World Bank and WHO (2026). Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report 2026. Washington, DC: World Bank.
25. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Steinert, J., Stenzel, F., Virkki, V., Wendt-Potthoff, K., Wunderling, N. and Rockström, J. (2025). Planetary Health Check 2025. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
27. Suri, T. and Jack, W. (2016). The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science, 354(6317), 1288–1292.
28. Tooze, A. (2022). Welcome to the world of the polycrisis. Financial Times, 28 October.
29. Uppsala Conflict Data Program and PRIO (2026). Conflict Trends: A Global Overview, 1946–2025. Uppsala University.
30. UN IGME (2025). Levels and Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2024. New York: UNICEF.
31. United Nations (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: UN.
32. United Nations and World Bank (2018). Pathways for Peace: Inclusive Approaches to Preventing Violent Conflict. Washington, DC: World Bank.
33. UNCTAD (2025). A World of Debt 2025. Geneva: UNCTAD.
34. UNDP (1994). Human Development Report 1994: New Dimensions of Human Security. New York: UNDP.
35. UNDRR (2025). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025: Resilience Pays. Geneva: UNDRR. preventionweb.net
36. UNEP (2025). Adaptation Gap Report 2025. Nairobi: UNEP. unep.org
37. UNESCO (2025). Out-of-school estimates, UNESCO Institute for Statistics and Global Education Monitoring Report.
38. UNHCR (2026). Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2025. Geneva: UNHCR.
39. WHO and UNICEF (2025). Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2024. Geneva: WHO and UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme. who.int
40. WHO and World Bank (2025). Tracking Universal Health Coverage: 2025 Global Monitoring Report. Geneva: WHO.
41. World Bank (2024). World Development Report 2024: The Middle Income Trap. Washington, DC: World Bank.
42. World Bank (2025). Poverty, Prosperity, and Planet Report and Poverty and Inequality Platform update (global extreme poverty line of $3.00 a day, 2021 PPP).
43. World Economic Forum (2026). Global Risks Report 2026. Geneva: WEF.
44. World Meteorological Organization (2026). State of the Global Climate 2025. Geneva: WMO.